Published on: September 20, 2024, 04:01h.
Last updated on: September 20, 2024, 04:01h.
A group opposing the idea of a Long Island casino hotel criticizes Las Vegas Sands for outsourcing operational duties for events at Nassau Coliseum, the proposed integrated resort site.
The “Say NO to the Casino Civic Association” expressed disappointment over Sands outsourcing Coliseum operations to ASM Global, alleging residents were misled.
Last year, Sands paid $241 million for the Coliseum lease, but a court ruling delayed the transfer due to violations. An environmental review is underway, with public meetings held to discuss the casino project.
Say NO to the Casino claims that by having ASM Global manage the Coliseum, public deception occurred.
All Sands Wants Is a Casino, Says Opposition Group
The group believes Sands’ outsourcing of Coliseum operations signals its sole interest in creating a casino resort, making the gaming company redundant in the process.
They argue that Sands serves as an unnecessary middleman, with the county ownership and ASM Global operation making Sands expendable.
The County could’ve easily hired ASM Global or its competitors directly to operate the venue, questioning the need for LVS as a ‘middle man,’ according to the opposition group’s statement.
Recently, the Coliseum hosted a rally for Trump’s 2024 campaign, with little financial benefit seen by the county or Sands.
Say NO to the Casino Frequent Critic of Sands
Say NO to the Casino has consistently criticized Sands and Nassau County throughout the casino licensing process.
While criticizing Sands’ use of Nassau Coliseum, it may be unfair as large-scale venue operation isn’t a gaming company’s expertise. Sands indicated its involvement is primarily driven by the casino aspect’s economic viability.
If Sands fails to secure a NYC-area casino license, they may need to explore revenue-generating options with the county for the property.