Laos Continues Pursuit of $5M from US Casino Investors Despite 14-Year Dispute |

The Laotian government, a one-party Communist state, is seeking over $5 million from American businessmen involved in a casino project that led to a lengthy legal dispute.

Laos, Savan Vegas, John K. Baldwin, Shawn Scott, casino arbitration — Savan Vegas, above, was the major success of the US-backed casino venture in Laos before relations with the government descended into a bitter legal battle. (Image: Savan Vegas)

A US appeals court recently allowed Laos to pursue casino tycoon John K. Baldwin and his company, Bridge Capital, for the outstanding debt.

This development is the latest in a complex legal saga that began in 2012, involving allegations of government interference, failed settlements, and multiple international arbitration rulings.

Baldwin and his partner Shawn Scott entered Laos in 2007 with ambitious plans to develop a casino business focused on cross-border customers.

They formed Sanum Investments and partnered with Laotian conglomerate ST Group, initially investing around $7.5 million in the venture, which included plans for two casino resorts and several slot clubs.

Their main success was Savan Vegas, strategically located near the Friendship Bridge connecting Laos with Thailand. However, a planned second resort, Paksong Vegas, never materialized.

Partnership Turns Sour

Within a few years, the partnership deteriorated, leading to a legal dispute in 2012 when Sanum and Lao Holdings accused Laos of trying to push them out of the country after Savan Vegas became profitable.

The disagreement escalated to international arbitration, alleging that Laos breached investment treaties safeguarding their businesses.

An initial settlement in 2014 collapsed, prompting the casino companies to renew their claims against Laos.

The arbitration rulings eventually sided with Laos, ordering the companies to pay millions in legal costs and expenses.

Laos is now pursuing the outstanding amount of over $5 million from Baldwin, Scott, and Bridge Capital, arguing that they should bear responsibility for the debt even though they were not individually named in the arbitration decisions.

A recent ruling by the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals reopened the case, allowing Laos to present its case for holding Baldwin and Bridge Capital liable for the awards granted against the companies they allegedly controlled.

Laos has been trying to collect the debt for over seven years and views the recent decision as a step towards recovery.

Philip Conneller has extensive experience covering the gaming industry for over eight years at Casino.org. He specializes in gaming law, white-collar crime, global money laundering, tribal gaming, politics, and regulation.

Philip’s background includes being the original features editor for popular poker publication Bluff Magazine and an editor for Bluff Europe. His work has been published in major outlets such as ESPN, Forbes, Time Out, The Sun, and The Daily Star, as well as industry-specific publications like iGaming Business and eGaming Review.

His news stories for Casino.org/news have been referenced by prominent media outlets like The Washington Post, The Daily Mail, People Magazine, and The Tonight Show starring Jimmy Fallon.

Philip once won $20,000 with a hand of 7-2 off-suit and has a knack for accidentally playing Elton John’s piano on both sides of the Atlantic.

He turned to writing due to his lack of piano skills and currently resides near London with his family, where he spends his time fretting over Arsenal FC.

Contact Philip at [email protected].

Source link